Portal Home > Knowledgebase > Articles Database > SSD Nodes Review
SSD Nodes Review
| Posted by MaxxTechz-Erick, 09-28-2011, 11:38 AM |
|
Hi, im a client of SSD Nodes Since 3 months ago and i love it there it has great support and great service i never had downtime. I have been attended by Matt Cornor hes the greatest support tech you will ever meat hes very friendly. Their Pakages are great and right on target wen it comes to prices, i got a cuote for a custom node and they delivered to my espectations. (sice i have restarted last time)
Current Time: Wednesday, 28-Sep-2011 11:36:27 EDT
Restart Time: Wednesday, 07-Sep-2011 19:05:06 EDT
Parent Server Generation: 338
Server uptime: 20 days 16 hours 31 minutes 21 seconds
Total accesses: 27274 - Total Traffic: 97.9 MB
CPU Usage: u0 s0 cu2.22 cs0 - .000124% CPU load
.0153 requests/sec - 57 B/second - 3764 B/request
1 requests currently being processed, 5 idle workers
|
| Posted by Zachary McClung, 09-28-2011, 11:40 AM |
|
Good to hear you have had great success. Wish you the best of luck in the future.
|
| Posted by bergholt, 09-28-2011, 11:47 AM |
|
Which command do you issue to get total stats like those?
|
| Posted by MaxxTechz-Erick, 09-28-2011, 03:22 PM |
|
You can login to ssh and type uptime or go to cPanel WHM: Main >> Server Status >> Apache Status
|
| Posted by bergholt, 09-28-2011, 03:29 PM |
|
'Uptime' only gives me number of hours the server's been up. No cpu usage info or requests/sec.
WHM says: "Failed to receive status information from Apache".
|
| Posted by Orien, 09-28-2011, 03:55 PM |
|
You would need to enable the status module.
|
| Posted by Matt Connor, 09-28-2011, 04:09 PM |
|
Thank you for your amazingly kind words! If you ever receive less than exemplary support please let me know.
|
| Posted by MaxxTechz-Erick, 09-28-2011, 04:37 PM |
|
ummmm rebuid apache
|
| Posted by NexDog, 09-28-2011, 10:50 PM |
|
So they are called "SSD Nodes" and offer cloud hosting on SATA II drives? Interesting.
|
| Posted by Matt Connor, 09-28-2011, 11:07 PM |
|
SSD volumes for performance, SATA for storage Using a combination of both gives clients the most flexibility with their contrasting workloads, rather than a "one-size-fits-all" solution (which doesn't work). We've been particularly successful with building nodes using SSD volumes for ZFS caching on FreeBSD, which provides fantastic performance benefits while still retaining large amount of storage space.
|
| Posted by NexDog, 09-28-2011, 11:47 PM |
|
Ah understood. Thanks for the clarification.
|
Add to Favourites 
Print this Article
Also Read
